Most cloud platforms require users to trust that the code they submitted is the code that actually ran. There is no independent way to confirm whether the runtime modified the workload, whether privileged operators intervened, or whether the environment matched the expected configuration. This lack of visibility poses a problem for regulated industries, multi-party workflows, and any scenario where the correctness of computation matters as much as the result.
Super introduces hardware-backed attestation that produces cryptographic proof of what executed inside the enclave. Each workload generates a verifiable record showing the code, environment, and measurement of the enclave, making tampering or unauthorized modifications detectable. The proof is portable, independently checkable, and does not rely on trust in the underlying cloud provider.
With verifiable execution, results stop being assumptions. Teams, partners, or auditors can independently confirm that a workload behaved exactly as intended, enabling collaboration and regulatory processes that previously required full operational trust.
In traditional cloud setups, accountability is opaque: operators, managed services, and system components may influence a workload, but users have no technical mechanism to detect or validate these interactions. Disputes or inconsistencies can’t be resolved through evidence — only through policy documents and logs controlled by the provider.
Super provides a transparent execution trail anchored in cryptographic evidence rather than platform assertions. Every participant in a workflow can validate the provenance of results, confirm that no unauthorized code ran, and ensure that no privileged layer intervened in execution. Verification happens externally, not within the provider’s trust boundary.
The result is an environment where outcomes can be proven, not debated. Multi-party pipelines gain a defensible basis for trust, and operational correctness can be demonstrated rather than promised.
Compliance in the cloud typically requires custom controls, manually audited environments, and strict segmentation. Despite all that work, sensitive operations still rely on the provider’s internal assurances, because data becomes visible during execution and audit trails aren’t cryptographically enforced. This leaves high-risk workloads dependent on procedural trust rather than technical guarantees.
Super builds compliance into the execution layer itself: data remains sealed inside enclaves, execution is provably isolated, and attestation records form an immutable audit trail. Compliance principles such as minimization, purpose limitation, isolation, and traceability are enforced by the architecture rather than by organizational process.
Regulated workloads can run without separate infrastructure, custom governance stacks, or compensating controls. Compliance becomes a property of the system — not an external burden placed on the teams using it.
